Site Loader
Trial begins for K-9 training business owner accused of stealing money from government


TODAY TODAY MARKS TODAY MARKS THE TODAY MARKS THE START TODAY MARKS THE START OF TODAY MARKS THE START OF
THE TODAY MARKS THE START OF
THE TRIAL TODAY MARKS THE START OF
THE TRIAL FOR TODAY MARKS THE START OF
THE TRIAL FOR THE TODAY MARKS THE START OF
THE TRIAL FOR THE OWNER TODAY MARKS THE START OF
THE TRIAL FOR THE OWNER OF TODAY MARKS THE START OF
THE TRIAL FOR THE OWNER OF A THE TRIAL FOR THE OWNER OF A THE TRIAL FOR THE OWNER OF A
LOCAL THE TRIAL FOR THE OWNER OF A
LOCAL CANINE THE TRIAL FOR THE OWNER OF A
LOCAL CANINE TRAINING THE TRIAL FOR THE OWNER OF A
LOCAL CANINE TRAINING BUSINESS LOCAL CANINE TRAINING BUSINESS LOCAL CANINE TRAINING BUSINESS
ACCUSED LOCAL CANINE TRAINING BUSINESS
ACCUSED OF LOCAL CANINE TRAINING BUSINESS
ACCUSED OF STEALING LOCAL CANINE TRAINING BUSINESS
ACCUSED OF STEALING MONEY LOCAL CANINE TRAINING BUSINESS
ACCUSED OF STEALING MONEY FROM ACCUSED OF STEALING MONEY FROM ACCUSED OF STEALING MONEY FROM
THE ACCUSED OF STEALING MONEY FROM
THE GOVERNMENT. ACCUSED OF STEALING MONEY FROM
THE GOVERNMENT. BRADLEY ACCUSED OF STEALING MONEY FROM
THE GOVERNMENT. BRADLEY KRAFT THE GOVERNMENT. BRADLEY KRAFT THE GOVERNMENT. BRADLEY KRAFT
WHO THE GOVERNMENT. BRADLEY KRAFT
WHO OWNS THE GOVERNMENT. BRADLEY KRAFT
WHO OWNS UNIVERSAL THE GOVERNMENT. BRADLEY KRAFT
WHO OWNS UNIVERSAL CANINE THE GOVERNMENT. BRADLEY KRAFT
WHO OWNS UNIVERSAL CANINE IS WHO OWNS UNIVERSAL CANINE IS WHO OWNS UNIVERSAL CANINE IS
CHARGED WHO OWNS UNIVERSAL CANINE IS
CHARGED WITH WHO OWNS UNIVERSAL CANINE IS
CHARGED WITH WIRE WHO OWNS UNIVERSAL CANINE IS
CHARGED WITH WIRE FRAUD CHARGED WITH WIRE FRAUD CHARGED WITH WIRE FRAUD
IDENTITY CHARGED WITH WIRE FRAUD
IDENTITY THEFT CHARGED WITH WIRE FRAUD
IDENTITY THEFT MONEY CHARGED WITH WIRE FRAUD
IDENTITY THEFT MONEY LAUNDERING IDENTITY THEFT MONEY LAUNDERING IDENTITY THEFT MONEY LAUNDERING
AND IDENTITY THEFT MONEY LAUNDERING
AND MAKING IDENTITY THEFT MONEY LAUNDERING
AND MAKING A IDENTITY THEFT MONEY LAUNDERING
AND MAKING A FALSE IDENTITY THEFT MONEY LAUNDERING
AND MAKING A FALSE TAX IDENTITY THEFT MONEY LAUNDERING
AND MAKING A FALSE TAX RETURN. AND MAKING A FALSE TAX RETURN. AND MAKING A FALSE TAX RETURN.
WHILE AND MAKING A FALSE TAX RETURN.
WHILE CAMERAS AND MAKING A FALSE TAX RETURN.
WHILE CAMERAS WERE AND MAKING A FALSE TAX RETURN.
WHILE CAMERAS WERE NOT AND MAKING A FALSE TAX RETURN.
WHILE CAMERAS WERE NOT ALLOWED WHILE CAMERAS WERE NOT ALLOWED WHILE CAMERAS WERE NOT ALLOWED
IN WHILE CAMERAS WERE NOT ALLOWED
IN FEDERAL WHILE CAMERAS WERE NOT ALLOWED
IN FEDERAL COURT WHILE CAMERAS WERE NOT ALLOWED
IN FEDERAL COURT EYEWITNESS IN FEDERAL COURT EYEWITNESS IN FEDERAL COURT EYEWITNESS
NEWS IN FEDERAL COURT EYEWITNESS
NEWS REPORTER IN FEDERAL COURT EYEWITNESS
NEWS REPORTER MARIAH IN FEDERAL COURT EYEWITNESS
NEWS REPORTER MARIAH MADINA IN FEDERAL COURT EYEWITNESS
NEWS REPORTER MARIAH MADINA WAS NEWS REPORTER MARIAH MADINA WAS NEWS REPORTER MARIAH MADINA WAS
THERE NEWS REPORTER MARIAH MADINA WAS
THERE AS NEWS REPORTER MARIAH MADINA WAS
THERE AS ATTORNEYS NEWS REPORTER MARIAH MADINA WAS
THERE AS ATTORNEYS FOR THERE AS ATTORNEYS FOR THERE AS ATTORNEYS FOR
THE THERE AS ATTORNEYS FOR
THE UNITED THERE AS ATTORNEYS FOR
THE UNITED STATES THERE AS ATTORNEYS FOR
THE UNITED STATES LAID THERE AS ATTORNEYS FOR
THE UNITED STATES LAID OUT THE UNITED STATES LAID OUT THE UNITED STATES LAID OUT
THEIR THE UNITED STATES LAID OUT
THEIR CASE. THE UNITED STATES LAID OUT
THEIR CASE. MORE THE UNITED STATES LAID OUT
THEIR CASE. MORE THAN THE UNITED STATES LAID OUT
THEIR CASE. MORE THAN A THE UNITED STATES LAID OUT
THEIR CASE. MORE THAN A YEAR THEIR CASE. MORE THAN A YEAR THEIR CASE. MORE THAN A YEAR
AFTER THEIR CASE. MORE THAN A YEAR
AFTER HIS THEIR CASE. MORE THAN A YEAR
AFTER HIS CANINE THEIR CASE. MORE THAN A YEAR
AFTER HIS CANINE TRAINING AFTER HIS CANINE TRAINING AFTER HIS CANINE TRAINING
FACILITIES AFTER HIS CANINE TRAINING
FACILITIES WERE AFTER HIS CANINE TRAINING
FACILITIES WERE RAIDED AFTER HIS CANINE TRAINING
FACILITIES WERE RAIDED BY FACILITIES WERE RAIDED BY FACILITIES WERE RAIDED BY
THE FACILITIES WERE RAIDED BY
THE FED FACILITIES WERE RAIDED BY
THE FED BRADLEY FACILITIES WERE RAIDED BY
THE FED BRADLEY CROFT FACILITIES WERE RAIDED BY
THE FED BRADLEY CROFT NOW FACILITIES WERE RAIDED BY
THE FED BRADLEY CROFT NOW ON THE FED BRADLEY CROFT NOW ON THE FED BRADLEY CROFT NOW ON
TRIAL THE FED BRADLEY CROFT NOW ON
TRIAL ON THE FED BRADLEY CROFT NOW ON
TRIAL ON A THE FED BRADLEY CROFT NOW ON
TRIAL ON A SLEW THE FED BRADLEY CROFT NOW ON
TRIAL ON A SLEW OF THE FED BRADLEY CROFT NOW ON
TRIAL ON A SLEW OF CHARGES TRIAL ON A SLEW OF CHARGES TRIAL ON A SLEW OF CHARGES
RELATING TRIAL ON A SLEW OF CHARGES
RELATING TO TRIAL ON A SLEW OF CHARGES
RELATING TO THAT TRIAL ON A SLEW OF CHARGES
RELATING TO THAT BUSINESS. RELATING TO THAT BUSINESS. RELATING TO THAT BUSINESS.
UNIVERSAL RELATING TO THAT BUSINESS.
UNIVERSAL CANINE RELATING TO THAT BUSINESS.
UNIVERSAL CANINE THE RELATING TO THAT BUSINESS.
UNIVERSAL CANINE THE CRUX RELATING TO THAT BUSINESS.
UNIVERSAL CANINE THE CRUX OF UNIVERSAL CANINE THE CRUX OF UNIVERSAL CANINE THE CRUX OF
THE UNIVERSAL CANINE THE CRUX OF
THE ALLEGATIONS UNIVERSAL CANINE THE CRUX OF
THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST UNIVERSAL CANINE THE CRUX OF
THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST KROFT THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST KROFT THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST KROFT
THAT THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST KROFT
THAT YOU THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST KROFT
THAT YOU FRAUDULENTLY THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST KROFT
THAT YOU FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED THAT YOU FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED THAT YOU FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED
APPROVAL THAT YOU FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED
APPROVAL TO THAT YOU FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED
APPROVAL TO GET THAT YOU FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED
APPROVAL TO GET G.I. THAT YOU FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED
APPROVAL TO GET G.I. BENEFITS APPROVAL TO GET G.I. BENEFITS APPROVAL TO GET G.I. BENEFITS
THROUGH APPROVAL TO GET G.I. BENEFITS
THROUGH THE APPROVAL TO GET G.I. BENEFITS
THROUGH THE TEXAS APPROVAL TO GET G.I. BENEFITS
THROUGH THE TEXAS VETERAN’S THROUGH THE TEXAS VETERAN’S THROUGH THE TEXAS VETERAN’S
COMMISSION. THROUGH THE TEXAS VETERAN’S
COMMISSION. ATTORNEYS THROUGH THE TEXAS VETERAN’S
COMMISSION. ATTORNEYS FOR COMMISSION. ATTORNEYS FOR COMMISSION. ATTORNEYS FOR
THE COMMISSION. ATTORNEYS FOR
THE UNITED COMMISSION. ATTORNEYS FOR
THE UNITED STATES COMMISSION. ATTORNEYS FOR
THE UNITED STATES SAY COMMISSION. ATTORNEYS FOR
THE UNITED STATES SAY WHEN COMMISSION. ATTORNEYS FOR
THE UNITED STATES SAY WHEN HE THE UNITED STATES SAY WHEN HE THE UNITED STATES SAY WHEN HE
APPLIED THE UNITED STATES SAY WHEN HE
APPLIED FOR THE UNITED STATES SAY WHEN HE
APPLIED FOR APPROVAL THE UNITED STATES SAY WHEN HE
APPLIED FOR APPROVAL HE THE UNITED STATES SAY WHEN HE
APPLIED FOR APPROVAL HE PUT APPLIED FOR APPROVAL HE PUT APPLIED FOR APPROVAL HE PUT
DOWN APPLIED FOR APPROVAL HE PUT
DOWN THE APPLIED FOR APPROVAL HE PUT
DOWN THE NAMES APPLIED FOR APPROVAL HE PUT
DOWN THE NAMES OF APPLIED FOR APPROVAL HE PUT
DOWN THE NAMES OF FOUR DOWN THE NAMES OF FOUR DOWN THE NAMES OF FOUR
INSTRUCTORS DOWN THE NAMES OF FOUR
INSTRUCTORS ONE DOWN THE NAMES OF FOUR
INSTRUCTORS ONE WHO DOWN THE NAMES OF FOUR
INSTRUCTORS ONE WHO HAD DOWN THE NAMES OF FOUR
INSTRUCTORS ONE WHO HAD BEEN INSTRUCTORS ONE WHO HAD BEEN INSTRUCTORS ONE WHO HAD BEEN
DEAD INSTRUCTORS ONE WHO HAD BEEN
DEAD FOR INSTRUCTORS ONE WHO HAD BEEN
DEAD FOR MORE INSTRUCTORS ONE WHO HAD BEEN
DEAD FOR MORE THAN INSTRUCTORS ONE WHO HAD BEEN
DEAD FOR MORE THAN A INSTRUCTORS ONE WHO HAD BEEN
DEAD FOR MORE THAN A YEAR. DEAD FOR MORE THAN A YEAR. DEAD FOR MORE THAN A YEAR.
THE DEAD FOR MORE THAN A YEAR.
THE OTHERS DEAD FOR MORE THAN A YEAR.
THE OTHERS THEY DEAD FOR MORE THAN A YEAR.
THE OTHERS THEY SAY DEAD FOR MORE THAN A YEAR.
THE OTHERS THEY SAY NEVER THE OTHERS THEY SAY NEVER THE OTHERS THEY SAY NEVER
ALLOWED THE OTHERS THEY SAY NEVER
ALLOWED KROFT THE OTHERS THEY SAY NEVER
ALLOWED KROFT TO THE OTHERS THEY SAY NEVER
ALLOWED KROFT TO PUT THE OTHERS THEY SAY NEVER
ALLOWED KROFT TO PUT THEIR THE OTHERS THEY SAY NEVER
ALLOWED KROFT TO PUT THEIR NAME ALLOWED KROFT TO PUT THEIR NAME ALLOWED KROFT TO PUT THEIR NAME
DOWN. ALLOWED KROFT TO PUT THEIR NAME
DOWN. COURT ALLOWED KROFT TO PUT THEIR NAME
DOWN. COURT RECORDS ALLOWED KROFT TO PUT THEIR NAME
DOWN. COURT RECORDS ALLEGE DOWN. COURT RECORDS ALLEGE DOWN. COURT RECORDS ALLEGE
AFTER DOWN. COURT RECORDS ALLEGE
AFTER HE DOWN. COURT RECORDS ALLEGE
AFTER HE FRAUDULENTLY DOWN. COURT RECORDS ALLEGE
AFTER HE FRAUDULENTLY GOT AFTER HE FRAUDULENTLY GOT AFTER HE FRAUDULENTLY GOT
APPROVAL AFTER HE FRAUDULENTLY GOT
APPROVAL TO AFTER HE FRAUDULENTLY GOT
APPROVAL TO TAP AFTER HE FRAUDULENTLY GOT
APPROVAL TO TAP A AFTER HE FRAUDULENTLY GOT
APPROVAL TO TAP A VETERAN’S AFTER HE FRAUDULENTLY GOT
APPROVAL TO TAP A VETERAN’S GI APPROVAL TO TAP A VETERAN’S GI APPROVAL TO TAP A VETERAN’S GI
BENEFITS APPROVAL TO TAP A VETERAN’S GI
BENEFITS KROFT APPROVAL TO TAP A VETERAN’S GI
BENEFITS KROFT RECRUITED BENEFITS KROFT RECRUITED BENEFITS KROFT RECRUITED
VETERANS BENEFITS KROFT RECRUITED
VETERANS TO BENEFITS KROFT RECRUITED
VETERANS TO TAKE BENEFITS KROFT RECRUITED
VETERANS TO TAKE HIS BENEFITS KROFT RECRUITED
VETERANS TO TAKE HIS DOG VETERANS TO TAKE HIS DOG VETERANS TO TAKE HIS DOG
HANDLER VETERANS TO TAKE HIS DOG
HANDLER COURSES VETERANS TO TAKE HIS DOG
HANDLER COURSES WHICH VETERANS TO TAKE HIS DOG
HANDLER COURSES WHICH RANGE HANDLER COURSES WHICH RANGE HANDLER COURSES WHICH RANGE
BETWEEN HANDLER COURSES WHICH RANGE
BETWEEN 60 HANDLER COURSES WHICH RANGE
BETWEEN 60 500 HANDLER COURSES WHICH RANGE
BETWEEN 60 500 AND HANDLER COURSES WHICH RANGE
BETWEEN 60 500 AND TWELVE BETWEEN 60 500 AND TWELVE BETWEEN 60 500 AND TWELVE
THOUSAND BETWEEN 60 500 AND TWELVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS. BETWEEN 60 500 AND TWELVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS. AND BETWEEN 60 500 AND TWELVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS. AND THEN BETWEEN 60 500 AND TWELVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS. AND THEN HE THOUSAND DOLLARS. AND THEN HE THOUSAND DOLLARS. AND THEN HE
BILLED THOUSAND DOLLARS. AND THEN HE
BILLED THE THOUSAND DOLLARS. AND THEN HE
BILLED THE GOVERNMENT THOUSAND DOLLARS. AND THEN HE
BILLED THE GOVERNMENT FOR BILLED THE GOVERNMENT FOR BILLED THE GOVERNMENT FOR
THE BILLED THE GOVERNMENT FOR
THE CLASSES BILLED THE GOVERNMENT FOR
THE CLASSES TAKEN BILLED THE GOVERNMENT FOR
THE CLASSES TAKEN BY THE CLASSES TAKEN BY THE CLASSES TAKEN BY
THE THE CLASSES TAKEN BY
THE VETERANS THE CLASSES TAKEN BY
THE VETERANS BETWEEN THE CLASSES TAKEN BY
THE VETERANS BETWEEN 2016 THE CLASSES TAKEN BY
THE VETERANS BETWEEN 2016 AND THE VETERANS BETWEEN 2016 AND THE VETERANS BETWEEN 2016 AND
2018 THE VETERANS BETWEEN 2016 AND
2018 AN THE VETERANS BETWEEN 2016 AND
2018 AN INDICTMENT THE VETERANS BETWEEN 2016 AND
2018 AN INDICTMENT ALLEGES 2018 AN INDICTMENT ALLEGES 2018 AN INDICTMENT ALLEGES
UNIVERSAL 2018 AN INDICTMENT ALLEGES
UNIVERSAL CANINE 2018 AN INDICTMENT ALLEGES
UNIVERSAL CANINE SUBMITTED UNIVERSAL CANINE SUBMITTED UNIVERSAL CANINE SUBMITTED
EDUCATION UNIVERSAL CANINE SUBMITTED
EDUCATION CLAIMS UNIVERSAL CANINE SUBMITTED
EDUCATION CLAIMS EXCEEDING UNIVERSAL CANINE SUBMITTED
EDUCATION CLAIMS EXCEEDING ONE EDUCATION CLAIMS EXCEEDING ONE EDUCATION CLAIMS EXCEEDING ONE
POINT EDUCATION CLAIMS EXCEEDING ONE
POINT TWO EDUCATION CLAIMS EXCEEDING ONE
POINT TWO MILLION EDUCATION CLAIMS EXCEEDING ONE
POINT TWO MILLION DOLLARS POINT TWO MILLION DOLLARS POINT TWO MILLION DOLLARS
DURING POINT TWO MILLION DOLLARS
DURING OPENING POINT TWO MILLION DOLLARS
DURING OPENING STATEMENTS. DURING OPENING STATEMENTS. DURING OPENING STATEMENTS.
ATTORNEYS DURING OPENING STATEMENTS.
ATTORNEYS FOR DURING OPENING STATEMENTS.
ATTORNEYS FOR THE DURING OPENING STATEMENTS.
ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED DURING OPENING STATEMENTS.
ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES
SAID ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES
SAID THAT ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES
SAID THAT THROUGH ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES
SAID THAT THROUGH ALL ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES
SAID THAT THROUGH ALL OF ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES
SAID THAT THROUGH ALL OF THIS. SAID THAT THROUGH ALL OF THIS. SAID THAT THROUGH ALL OF THIS.
KROFT SAID THAT THROUGH ALL OF THIS.
KROFT CLAIMED SAID THAT THROUGH ALL OF THIS.
KROFT CLAIMED IN SAID THAT THROUGH ALL OF THIS.
KROFT CLAIMED IN A SAID THAT THROUGH ALL OF THIS.
KROFT CLAIMED IN A TAX SAID THAT THROUGH ALL OF THIS.
KROFT CLAIMED IN A TAX RETURN KROFT CLAIMED IN A TAX RETURN KROFT CLAIMED IN A TAX RETURN
THAT KROFT CLAIMED IN A TAX RETURN
THAT HE KROFT CLAIMED IN A TAX RETURN
THAT HE MADE KROFT CLAIMED IN A TAX RETURN
THAT HE MADE ONLY KROFT CLAIMED IN A TAX RETURN
THAT HE MADE ONLY TWO KROFT CLAIMED IN A TAX RETURN
THAT HE MADE ONLY TWO THOUSAND THAT HE MADE ONLY TWO THOUSAND THAT HE MADE ONLY TWO THOUSAND
DOLLARS THAT HE MADE ONLY TWO THOUSAND
DOLLARS DESPITE THAT HE MADE ONLY TWO THOUSAND
DOLLARS DESPITE EVIDENCE THAT HE MADE ONLY TWO THOUSAND
DOLLARS DESPITE EVIDENCE HE DOLLARS DESPITE EVIDENCE HE DOLLARS DESPITE EVIDENCE HE
SPENT DOLLARS DESPITE EVIDENCE HE
SPENT QUOTE DOLLARS DESPITE EVIDENCE HE
SPENT QUOTE GROSSLY DOLLARS DESPITE EVIDENCE HE
SPENT QUOTE GROSSLY IN DOLLARS DESPITE EVIDENCE HE
SPENT QUOTE GROSSLY IN EXCESS SPENT QUOTE GROSSLY IN EXCESS SPENT QUOTE GROSSLY IN EXCESS
OF SPENT QUOTE GROSSLY IN EXCESS
OF THAT SPENT QUOTE GROSSLY IN EXCESS
OF THAT ATTORNEYS SPENT QUOTE GROSSLY IN EXCESS
OF THAT ATTORNEYS FOR OF THAT ATTORNEYS FOR OF THAT ATTORNEYS FOR
THE OF THAT ATTORNEYS FOR
THE GOVERNMENT OF THAT ATTORNEYS FOR
THE GOVERNMENT SAID OF THAT ATTORNEYS FOR
THE GOVERNMENT SAID THAT OF THAT ATTORNEYS FOR
THE GOVERNMENT SAID THAT THEY THE GOVERNMENT SAID THAT THEY THE GOVERNMENT SAID THAT THEY
WILL THE GOVERNMENT SAID THAT THEY
WILL CALL THE GOVERNMENT SAID THAT THEY
WILL CALL THE THE GOVERNMENT SAID THAT THEY
WILL CALL THE THREE THE GOVERNMENT SAID THAT THEY
WILL CALL THE THREE LIVING WILL CALL THE THREE LIVING WILL CALL THE THREE LIVING
INDIVIDUALS WILL CALL THE THREE LIVING
INDIVIDUALS LISTED WILL CALL THE THREE LIVING
INDIVIDUALS LISTED AS INDIVIDUALS LISTED AS INDIVIDUALS LISTED AS
INSTRUCTORS INDIVIDUALS LISTED AS
INSTRUCTORS IN INDIVIDUALS LISTED AS
INSTRUCTORS IN THE INDIVIDUALS LISTED AS
INSTRUCTORS IN THE APPLICATION INSTRUCTORS IN THE APPLICATION INSTRUCTORS IN THE APPLICATION
FOR INSTRUCTORS IN THE APPLICATION
FOR APPROVAL INSTRUCTORS IN THE APPLICATION
FOR APPROVAL FOR INSTRUCTORS IN THE APPLICATION
FOR APPROVAL FOR G.I. INSTRUCTORS IN THE APPLICATION
FOR APPROVAL FOR G.I. FUNDS INSTRUCTORS IN THE APPLICATION
FOR APPROVAL FOR G.I. FUNDS TO FOR APPROVAL FOR G.I. FUNDS TO FOR APPROVAL FOR G.I. FUNDS TO
TESTIFY FOR APPROVAL FOR G.I. FUNDS TO
TESTIFY DURING FOR APPROVAL FOR G.I. FUNDS TO
TESTIFY DURING THE FOR APPROVAL FOR G.I. FUNDS TO
TESTIFY DURING THE TRIAL FOR APPROVAL FOR G.I. FUNDS TO
TESTIFY DURING THE TRIAL TODAY TESTIFY DURING THE TRIAL TODAY TESTIFY DURING THE TRIAL TODAY
KROFT TESTIFY DURING THE TRIAL TODAY
KROFT ALSO TESTIFY DURING THE TRIAL TODAY
KROFT ALSO WAIVING TESTIFY DURING THE TRIAL TODAY
KROFT ALSO WAIVING HIS TESTIFY DURING THE TRIAL TODAY
KROFT ALSO WAIVING HIS RIGHT TESTIFY DURING THE TRIAL TODAY
KROFT ALSO WAIVING HIS RIGHT TO KROFT ALSO WAIVING HIS RIGHT TO KROFT ALSO WAIVING HIS RIGHT TO
A KROFT ALSO WAIVING HIS RIGHT TO
A JURY KROFT ALSO WAIVING HIS RIGHT TO
A JURY TRIAL KROFT ALSO WAIVING HIS RIGHT TO
A JURY TRIAL MEANING KROFT ALSO WAIVING HIS RIGHT TO
A JURY TRIAL MEANING HIS KROFT ALSO WAIVING HIS RIGHT TO
A JURY TRIAL MEANING HIS FATE A JURY TRIAL MEANING HIS FATE A JURY TRIAL MEANING HIS FATE
IS A JURY TRIAL MEANING HIS FATE
IS NOW A JURY TRIAL MEANING HIS FATE
IS NOW IN A JURY TRIAL MEANING HIS FATE
IS NOW IN THE A JURY TRIAL MEANING HIS FATE
IS NOW IN THE HANDS A JURY TRIAL MEANING HIS FATE
IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF A JURY TRIAL MEANING HIS FATE
IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF SENIOR IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF SENIOR IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF SENIOR
U.S. IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF SENIOR
U.S. DISTRICT IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF SENIOR
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF SENIOR
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DAVID IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF SENIOR
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DAVID EZRA U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DAVID EZRA U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DAVID EZRA
WHO U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DAVID EZRA
WHO IS U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DAVID EZRA
WHO IS A U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DAVID EZRA
WHO IS A VETERAN U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DAVID EZRA
WHO IS A VETERAN HIMSELF WHO IS A VETERAN HIMSELF WHO IS A VETERAN HIMSELF
KRAFT’S WHO IS A VETERAN HIMSELF
KRAFT’S ATTORNEY WHO IS A VETERAN HIMSELF
KRAFT’S ATTORNEY TOLD WHO IS A VETERAN HIMSELF
KRAFT’S ATTORNEY TOLD KENS WHO IS A VETERAN HIMSELF
KRAFT’S ATTORNEY TOLD KENS 5 KRAFT’S ATTORNEY TOLD KENS 5 KRAFT’S ATTORNEY TOLD KENS 5
THAT KRAFT’S ATTORNEY TOLD KENS 5
THAT NEITHER KRAFT’S ATTORNEY TOLD KENS 5
THAT NEITHER HE KRAFT’S ATTORNEY TOLD KENS 5
THAT NEITHER HE NOR KRAFT’S ATTORNEY TOLD KENS 5
THAT NEITHER HE NOR KROFT KRAFT’S ATTORNEY TOLD KENS 5
THAT NEITHER HE NOR KROFT WOULD THAT NEITHER HE NOR KROFT WOULD THAT NEITHER HE NOR KROFT WOULD
BE THAT NEITHER HE NOR KROFT WOULD
BE SPEAKING THAT NEITHER HE NOR KROFT WOULD
BE SPEAKING TO THAT NEITHER HE NOR KROFT WOULD
BE SPEAKING TO MEMBERS THAT NEITHER HE NOR KROFT WOULD
BE SPEAKING TO MEMBERS OF BE SPEAKING TO MEMBERS OF BE SPEAKING TO MEMBERS OF
THE BE SPEAKING TO MEMBERS OF
THE MEDIA BE SPEAKING TO MEMBERS OF
THE MEDIA ABOUT

Reynold King

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *